Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Deliberative Discourse and First-Year Composition (FYC)

Braun, M.J. "The Prospects for Rhetoric in a First-Year Composition Program: Deliberative      Discourse as a Vehicle for Change?" Writing Program Administration 31.3 (2008): 89-109. EBSCOhost. Web. 24 September 2013.

M.J. Braun's article, "The Prospects for Rhetoric in a First-Year Composition Program: Deliberative Discourse as a Vehicle for Change?", presents a possible answer to the question Rhetoric or Composition? First-Year composition is a contested space due to labor issues and debates about what should and should not be a part of first-year composition. This article continues the debate about the role of FYC, its position in the university, and pedagogical approaches. This is a necessary conversation because it addresses the impact of the administration on what takes place in FYC. It also brings to light (possible) distinctions between rhetoric and composition.

Braun's article posits that FYC should break with traditional composition. Using narrative, the history of rhetoric and composition, and deliberative rhetoric, based on "agnostic and radically democratic strategies" developed by Chantal Moufee, he argues that composition programs should focus on rhetoric instead of the current-traditionalist approach to composition. The argument focuses on using deliberative discourse to challenge the current curriculum and to establish continued research in rhetoric and rhetorical pedagogy. Braun supports the argument for a return to rhetoric by identifying how, students, in significant social and political moments, were not inept at engaging in/with the issues (i.e. (9/11). Braun presents that a return to rhetoric as "theoretical discourse" would allow students to  "knowledgeably and ethically participate in opinion-making and knowledge-making discourses by developing their understanding of the multiplicity of ways persuasion takes place" (92). He presents that traditional composition's focus on aesthetics (grammar/usage) does not take into account "the living genres that circulate in everyday and academic life"(93). He positions rhetoric and composition in opposition to one another.  The latter is presented as taking place in a vacuum, wherein writing takes place individually with correct grammar and usage without being engaged with the texts/audiences that already exist in the world.

Braun engaged in deliberative discussions with instructors, adjuncts, and graduate students about disciplinary identity and pedagogy.  He presents that these discussions were agnostic and radically democratic in that the discussions did not seek consensus or compromise; the goal was to have an informed solution. Through the narrative, he shares the challenges faced from other faculty and the administration. The administration was resistant to transforming the writing program in part to what Braun identifies as "market forces." On the other hand, the writing faculty and graduate students, openly engaged in discussions about changing the goals of instruction and replacing concepts of composition with rhetorical theory. Ultimately, Braun's argument rests on his belief that current composition is "arhetorical" and does not require students to engage with existing texts and use rhetorical strategies that take into account various audiences and purposes; this approach, he argues, will develop students' abilities to examine and engage complex social and political situations.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Everything is Rhetoric...but Composition

Crowley, Sharon. "Composition Is Not Rhetoric." Enculturation 5.1 (2003). Web. 9 Sept. 2013.


            The title of Sharon Crowley’s article “Composition is not Rhetoric” presents a strong statement about the state of rhetoric and composition as disciplines. She begins with the eye-opening statement: "Composition, as it has been practiced in the required first-year course for more than 100 years, has nothing whatever to do with rhetoric." This clearly presents that rhetoric and composition are different and separate disciplines and activities. Crowley presents that invention along with civic and social discourse are essential to rhetoric. Her primary concern is that over the years rhetoric has been removed from composition and the focus shifted to choosing a subject (invention) and the five-paragraph essay (arrangement).  Because of the shift in composition, the integration of social and political discourse is also complicated. She acknowledges that composition theorist and teachers attempt to integrate civic activities and service-learning into their courses. However, Crowley argues, that their motivations lie with "Marx and neo-marxist theorists" and "the brand of cultural studies associated with the work of Raymond Williams and Stuart Hall. The move is not motivated by the study of rhetoric.  Crowley aligns herself with Charles Sears Baldwin’s argument rhetoric and rhetorical pedagogy has turned into sophistry. We, modern users of rhetoric and composition, have become focused on effectiveness of the speaker instead of the message. Basically, rhetoric cannot work, as it should, without invention and the "canon that ties it to social and public use."  Ultimately, Crowley distinguishes rhetoric from all other disciplines because of its focus on invention.

            I think Crowley's article is necessary for scholars in rhetoric and composition because it begins the conversation in regards to defining or redefining composition. She makes a clear distinction between composition of the past and "modern" composition. This is something that I never considered. The idea of a composition of the past that works well with rhetoric and the composition of the present, which pushes rhetoric to the fringes, is intriguing and worrisome. I also think it is important to question the intentions behind reintegrating rhetoric into the composition classroom. What are the motivations behind this decision? Is the desire to return rhetoric or to integrate cultural studies? This essay would be a good starting point for anyone making pedagogical decisions in regards to a first-year composition course. It would also be useful for scholars and teachers who are trying to situate themselves in rhetoric and composition. For me, it brought about questions in regards to how I define rhetoric, whether invention is essential to rhetoric, and if my use of social and civic discourse is tied to cultural theorists.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Guess Who's Bizzack?

I am not sure if that is an appropriate title for an academic blog, but I guess that is part of why I am here. I want to find all those things that are not appropriate for the academic and make them appropriate.

Why? Because I can.

I want to roll up to the Ivory Tower with my ceiling missing, blasting 2-Chainz, and discussing how he subverts mainstream culture by simply managing to make it to the mainstream. That's another post.

This blog is my journey into bring my two worlds together: hip hop and rhet/comp. Many say they do not belong together and some will label it cultural studies. Call it what you will. As they say in hip hop: "We outchea" (We out here).  Meaning, I am here to stay and to represent. No matter the label, I'm here to turn the academy into a cypher.

This point forward begins my return to the academy as a student and not a teacher. From here on all posts are focused on Composition as Applied Rhetoric. I am currently torn on how I feel about composition and rhetoric. One thing I sure of is that they belong together. What I want to figure out is what the represent individually, why they belong together, and how can both be utilized effectively.

I believe that rhetoric embodies the tools, techniques, skills, etc that we use to compose. The situation of communication, in itself, is rhetorical. I am simplifying a bit, but you get the gist. Well, thanks to all who wander here and to those required for this class.

Welcome to Academic Cypher!

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Ning in the Online FY Writing Course

Monday, June 7, 2010

Review Paradigm Online Writing Assistant

Pedagogical Tool Review: Paradigm Online Writing Assistant

Distance Education and Writing

In composition there are hundreds if not thousands of textbooks, handbooks, guides, software programs, and services aimed at helping students to understand the writing process and how to create a finished product. Now that there is distance education, many of these products have been transferred into an online version, so they can be more accessible to the online learning community. The community that they served in print form, however, can sometimes be very different from the community served online. The demographics of the online learning environment has changed and does not, necessarily, reflect the traditional on-campus classroom. There is often greater diversity in race, age, gender, and ability online. Online classes bring together students from a wide range of abilities. Some students are not at the level to understand the course materials, have little experience with writing, do not understand how to navigate online, or are financial unable to purchase course materials. Access is always an issue in education. When designing a course, the instructor wants students to be able to utilize the course material and any resources available. There are always instances where students may not be able to understand or afford the course material and resources. In a distance education course, the instructor is less capable of connecting with the student to aid in them in acquiring necessary materials. In the instance where materials are available online, they should be utilized. Writing can be a difficult subject to teach at a distance, getting students to understand the recursive nature of the writing process, crafting a finished product, and constructing knowledge is complicated even in face-to-face classes. A useful tool for this type of approach is an online writing guide. The Paradigm Online Writing Assistant provides writing guidance and resources.
In order to effectively teach such a wide range of students about process driven writing without depending on hegemonic tools that may overshadow some learners, instructors have to find resources that are effective, accessible, and easy to understand.

What is POWA?

The Paradigm Online Writing Assistant (POWA) is an online writing guide that is located both on the web and in hard copy. The book is available for purchase online, but the website is free and interactive; it serves as both a writing guide and a handbook. POWA was created and written by Chuck Guilford. Chuck Guilford is an emeritus associate professor of English at Boise State University. He has taught composition, creative writing, and literature classes on the undergraduate and graduate level. Guilford describes POWA as “a distillation and collage of numerous writings, talks, and activities that I’ve developed over the years and tried out on students, colleagues, and mentors with varying degrees of success.” This writing guide and handbook is useful for distance education because it is easy to navigate, accessible to all students, and comprehensive.

Ease and Accessibility

The POWA site is well designed, which makes it easy to find information. The site has little graphics, which can make it less appealing to more visual learners. However, the site is still attractive and very user-friendly. The links for the site are provided in a top and left side navigation menu. The website also has an on-site search tool that quickly searches the entire site. The ease of navigation is important for distance education courses where students will have varying levels of computer literacy. The only knowledge needed in order to use this tool is knowledge of the Internet. The site utilizes interactive menus that are used on most websites. If used as a resource in a course, the tool does not need to be revised for any particular audience or modified to fit into the course.

POWA is free site, so there is not additional cost for it use. For free students can access all of the content as well as news and links to other writing resources. Registered members gain access to additional features, but these are not necessary for guidance through writing. Use of this resource will not add to the textbook burden.

Another reason the site is accessible is because it was designed for all students. The site was designed to be used by all writers; experienced writers as well as beginners can easily find information and understand it. This is another important element for distance education. Students enter the course with varying levels of competency for writing. This site can meet the students where they are. There is information for how to get started with writing as well as tips for more advanced writers on how to hone writing skills and improve what they have already written.


Comprehensive

POWA is a great writing guide/handbook but unlike traditional handbooks that focus on grammar and style, it teaches a process-based approach to writing. It achieves this by providing sections on all parts of the writing process. It features sections on discovering, organizing, revising, and editing. For example, the Discovering takes the student through choosing a subject, freewriting, observing details, asking journalists’ questions, dramatism, tagmemeics, and using outside sources. There is a comprehensive presentation of a wide range of prewriting techniques. Each section is explained clearly and most of them have practice activities at the end. Even a section like dramatism, which can be difficult for some students to grapple with and may be beyond most first-year composition classes, is explained in a clear manner: “Dramatism offers a simple yet effective way to generate ideas. It resembles the Journalists’ Questions and, like them, can be applied to many topics.” It goes on to provide examples of each part of dramatism/pentad and an explanation.

In addition to this, POWA also focuses on students working toward a product. It is primarily focused on the writing and very conducive to encourage students to create a product. There is background and explanation on different types of essays: informal essays, thesis/support essays, argumentative essays, and exploratory essays. The site also provides information on how to document sources. Each section of the site provides information, tips, and activities to help students incorporate the concepts.

Besides being free and easily accessible, this site can facilitate distance learning by acting as an additional resource and aid to students. This can be particularly useful in an online course where the student cannot get in contact with the instructor. Because it completely focuses on the teaching of writing, it is a reliable resource that can supplement what students learn in the course. This tool can provide an example for students to help them with their writing issues. POWA is similar to many other websites and handbooks that are available. It is very similar to Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL). Although, Purdue is extensive and very effective, it is not as easy to navigate as POWA. Handbooks such as the Little Brown are also available online. The Little Brown Handbook, like POWA, is also available in hard copy. The POWA is more accessible than the Little Brown as none of the POWA is restricted on the site. There is the same level of content on the POWA site as in the book.

Another interesting tidbit about POWA is its focus on community. The website is a place people to “write, share, and celebrate language.” Although, the free features are very effective and useful in a writing class, the features for registered members offers a great resource for a distance education writing class. Registered members have access to galleries, forums, profiles, instant messaging, special interest groups, and blogs. This element of the site shows collaborative writing and social networking in action in an academic writing context. The site itself is a lesson in collaborative and socially constructed learning. The site was created out of talks, lectures, and notes and continues to be developed through what is created on the forum and blogs. Registration is free; however, access to all of the writing content is available whether you register or not. Registration provides access to the blogs, forums, and other features mentioned above.

Overall, Paradigm Online Writing Assistant offers an array of content in an easy to navigate design that any student with web surfing experience can understand. The site is free to use and provides a wealth of information. It is a great reference for instructors and students whether they are in or teaching a developmental writing course or freshman composition. It can serve as primary reading material for the course or as supplemental reading. It is a great resource that instructors can use as a guide for students who need a little extra help with writing or for students who want to fine tune their product. It is also a good example of collaborative writing and sharing of knowledge in action. There are a lot of resources available to students online, but POWA is easy to access, navigate, and understand. This helps to ensure that no students are loss to the resources because of access, ability, or cost.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Transformative Pedagogy: Perfect for Web 2.0 and Collaboration

Meyers, Steven A. “Using Transformative Pedagogy When Teaching Online” College
Teaching. 56.4 (2008): 219-224. Web. 4 June 2010.


Steven Meyers article explores how transformative pedagogy works well for online learning. Meyers presents the idea that because transformative pedagogy encourages examination of assumptions, interaction with social issues, and social action it is ideal for faculty who teach online courses. Online courses attract a large number of students and a diverse group of students. This dynamic along with the fact that online class discussions are more informal, which challenges the traditional levels of power and authority in the classroom, and the “egalitarian environment” are good environments for teaching that encourages critical thinking, examination of societal patterns (219). Meyers focuses on the literature on transformative pedagogy and knowledge of the online environment to provide suggestions for how online instructors can use transformative pedagogy effectively. He supports these suggestions with student reflections. Meyers’ suggestions are:

•Create a safe and inviting environment
Transformative pedagogy does not focus on teaching styles that increase the power difference between instructor and student. The focus is on creating trust and the instructor acting as a guide and not as a great imparter of knowledge.

•Encourage students to think about their experiences, beliefs, and biases
Instructors should create discussion postings that encourage students to examine the source of their assumptions and consider alternative perspectives.

•Use teaching strategies that promote student engagement and participation
Meyers suggests Internet adaptations and extensions. Students should feel a responsibility to contribute to the class. Use of email and online newspapers to do analysis in a collaborative manner can help to increase student engagement. Internet extensions focus on using Internet tools not readily available in face-to-face such as weblogs, wikis, etc. These can generate student cooperation and collaborative construction of knowledge.

•Pose real-world problems that address societal inequalities
This approach encourages students to be aware of how society impacts people by examining race, social class, gender, sexual orientation, age, and disability, examining the systemic inequalities within the content and the tools themselves.

•Help students implement action-oriented solutions
This strategy focuses on rotating between student reflection and action. Students can participate in local projects; write editorials to local or university newspapers, creating activities, or participating in activities. The Internet can provide a resource for coordination, communication, and research.

Meyers article is a great resource for any instructor who wants to increase student engagement and collaboration along with addressing issues of conflict in society and ones that may arise within the classroom. It also aids instructors in avoiding the creation of a hegemonic learning environment. The article gives a good background on transformative pedagogy and insight into the online learning environment. The suggestions provided are realistic and useful in face-to-face and online courses. Composition courses often focus writing assignments on critical thinking, reflection, conflict, and argument. An online composition course is ideal for transformative pedagogy that seeks to give students knowledge of content, self-awareness, and a larger worldview. The Internet is an effective arena for this because there are more tools available for collaboration, communication, and information exchange.